What process can you follow to try to make sure at what you are getting is the truth?
• talk to as many people as you can on the subject
• make eye contact
• try to read their body language
• be sure to get quotes
• do research on the topic or background information
• check out your facts
Once you got it (the truth), then how do you present the truth to the reader?
• write in a story telling format
• don’t make your graphs to long
• have a strong lede
• don’t dance around the subject or sugar coat things
• choose the right words
• don’t make it look like you are trying to hard to tell the story
What is the context…focus in what Bernstein means about context…How can Murray’s ideas work to obtain the truth
• it is the information in the story
• hopefully, it is the truth, but it hard to tell exactly what the truth is
• these two men focus on trying to obtain the truth, but how?
• basically, use your best judgment, more often than not, reporters should be somewhat moral people, so go with your guy and instinct
• Murray’s techniques should help us by telling the story and using the elements of newsworthiness to try to unearth the truth
Wednesday, November 14, 2007
Monday, November 5, 2007
David Usborne's 9/11
1) He makes the story flow like a good novel. I liked the piece a lot, wanting to read more even after the story finished. Just like the Pulitzer Prize winning piece I read, this one made me want to read more. It is different reading journalists accounts who where actually there and who actually saw everything versus someone who would be reporting in the Midwest or as far as the West Coast. What is the same about the day after and Dec. pieces of the disaster are he explains what he saw, what was going on, the people he interviewed, what was going through his head. However, the day after piece has MORE urgency, as far as getting to a phone to share what he was going through. Also, on the day after, he really didn’t comprehend what was going on. He kind of shrugged off the falling bodies, looking at the "specks" until he focused on what was really going on at the time. I am sure that after four months, he had time to reflect and process everything he was being bombarded with. What this tells me about deadline writing is people work well under pressure, but they might comprehend or understand everything they have written until they have a chance to read it when it is published. Only then can they go back and study what was written to understand everything.
3) I learned from him about the ethics and instincts where always try to get to the source no matter what. But, on the flip-side he finally did figure out he had to get away, for safety's sake. I remember him saying in the story he imagined going inside the buildings and examining what was going on, because only the building's top was on fire, and he didn't even think, like many other people, it would come down. He just wanted to get closer than and as close as he could to everything that was going on. What I learned from him, that I can apply, is just get as close to as possible to the source...but don't get hurt doing it or don't be in the way of police, fire fighters, etc.
3) I learned from him about the ethics and instincts where always try to get to the source no matter what. But, on the flip-side he finally did figure out he had to get away, for safety's sake. I remember him saying in the story he imagined going inside the buildings and examining what was going on, because only the building's top was on fire, and he didn't even think, like many other people, it would come down. He just wanted to get closer than and as close as he could to everything that was going on. What I learned from him, that I can apply, is just get as close to as possible to the source...but don't get hurt doing it or don't be in the way of police, fire fighters, etc.
Friday, November 2, 2007
The Eye of the Storm Story
Quote 1 -
"In the movie "Armageddon," the asteroid pierced New York buildings sending shrapnel out the other side. That, remarkably, is exactly what it looked like from the street, when the first plane hit the north tower of the World Trade center."
Having seen this movie, this is an excellent choice to use, because it explains really what happened through a "fictional" Hollywood movie...which seemed to come true during this time.
Quote 2 -
"In the blackness, he tried his radio: "Mike! Mike! Where are you?" No answer. Again, and no answer. My hand was on his trembling back, the better to brace myself, and I thought about asking him how long these blackouts and ash clouds could last. Then I realized the full ridiculousness of the question. How would he know? How often does a 110-story building collapse to the ground. I honestly wondered whether I'd survive long enough for the air to clear."
This quote, was one that stuck out to me, maybe because he says how big the building actually is, a 110-stories, and how the massive building had so much of an impact, literally, when it collapsed onto the ground...I remember when watching this in high school, I was thinking more of the people inside the building and yards away from the entrance, not really who where blocks away. Reading this, it shows the account of what was going on semi-away from the area, and it was still just as bad. The repercussions of the fall where immense for blocks, to even miles away.
Quote 3-
"If there's only one sight I'll remember from the destruction of the World Trade Center, it is the flight of desperation -- the headlong leap from the top-most floors by those who chose a different death than the choking smoke and flame. Some fell swinging their arms and legs, looking down as the street came up at them. Others fell on their backs, peering upward toward the flames and sky. They dropped like deadweight, several seconds, hopeless and unhelpable. Always the same end. Some crashed into the Plexiglas awning over the entrance to the North Tower. Others hit a retaining wall. Still others landed on lampposts and shrubbery. After the 80-floor drop, the impact left small puffs of pink and red drifting at ground level. Firefighters arriving on the scene ran for cover."
This quote is probably the most powerful graph of the story. Reading this, and the rest of the story, it seems like it is straight from a book or movie...it is frightening this is from an eye witness who was watching all these deaths while the buildings where on fire, then came down. The way he talks and describes it makes it far more real to me, and I live in the Midwest, obviously a very long ways away.
"In the movie "Armageddon," the asteroid pierced New York buildings sending shrapnel out the other side. That, remarkably, is exactly what it looked like from the street, when the first plane hit the north tower of the World Trade center."
Having seen this movie, this is an excellent choice to use, because it explains really what happened through a "fictional" Hollywood movie...which seemed to come true during this time.
Quote 2 -
"In the blackness, he tried his radio: "Mike! Mike! Where are you?" No answer. Again, and no answer. My hand was on his trembling back, the better to brace myself, and I thought about asking him how long these blackouts and ash clouds could last. Then I realized the full ridiculousness of the question. How would he know? How often does a 110-story building collapse to the ground. I honestly wondered whether I'd survive long enough for the air to clear."
This quote, was one that stuck out to me, maybe because he says how big the building actually is, a 110-stories, and how the massive building had so much of an impact, literally, when it collapsed onto the ground...I remember when watching this in high school, I was thinking more of the people inside the building and yards away from the entrance, not really who where blocks away. Reading this, it shows the account of what was going on semi-away from the area, and it was still just as bad. The repercussions of the fall where immense for blocks, to even miles away.
Quote 3-
"If there's only one sight I'll remember from the destruction of the World Trade Center, it is the flight of desperation -- the headlong leap from the top-most floors by those who chose a different death than the choking smoke and flame. Some fell swinging their arms and legs, looking down as the street came up at them. Others fell on their backs, peering upward toward the flames and sky. They dropped like deadweight, several seconds, hopeless and unhelpable. Always the same end. Some crashed into the Plexiglas awning over the entrance to the North Tower. Others hit a retaining wall. Still others landed on lampposts and shrubbery. After the 80-floor drop, the impact left small puffs of pink and red drifting at ground level. Firefighters arriving on the scene ran for cover."
This quote is probably the most powerful graph of the story. Reading this, and the rest of the story, it seems like it is straight from a book or movie...it is frightening this is from an eye witness who was watching all these deaths while the buildings where on fire, then came down. The way he talks and describes it makes it far more real to me, and I live in the Midwest, obviously a very long ways away.
Monday, October 29, 2007
Simon Quotes
Quote 1 -
“So much of what comes out of Hollywood is horseshit. Because these people live in West L.A., they don’t even go to East L.A. The only time they go downtown is to get their license renewed. And what they increasingly know about the world is what they see on other TV shows about cops or crime or poverty. The American entertainment industry gets poverty so relentlessly wrong. . . . Poor people are either the salt of the earth, and they’re there to exalt us with their homespun wisdom and their sheer grit and determination to rise up, or they are people to be beaten up in an interrogation room by Sipowicz. . . . How is it that there’s nobody actually on a human scale from the other America? The reason is they’ve never met anybody from the other America. I mean, they could ask their gardener what it’s like.”
Well in terms of reporting, I guess you could get from this is don't be afraid to say what you think/or feel and put it out all on the table. He was to the point, when he said this, where he could say what he felt. However, I wouldn't do that as a rookie journalist, but if someone offers you an opinion piece or column, then go for it. However, maybe keep the language PG-13. I think how it works in terms for me is say what is on my mind and don't be afraid, not really afraid of what to say, but use it as don't be afraid of a challenge and whatnot to speak my mind or just go and do something.
Quote 2-
"To be a decent city reporter, I had to listen to people who were different from me,” Simon explained. “I had to not be uncomfortable asking stupid questions or being on the outside. I found I had a knack for walking into situations where I didn’t know anything, and just waiting. A lot of reporters don’t want to be the butt of jokes. But sometimes it’s useful to act as if you couldn’t find your ass with both hands.”
I think this is a rather important quote because he is basically giving a golden rule. It would be hard, for example, if a racist reporter was out there and refused to interview an African American (if it where important for a certain story), that would be a part of the story that was much needed but wasn't used because the person was stubborn. What I mean by all this is basically what he said, which is pretty clear, ask any question, and just try and learn what you don't know. Getting outside of my comfort zone is key for this profession. By doing this, it will allow me to succeed in really whatever I want, especially in the job world.
Quote 3-
“I’m the kind of person who, when I’m writing, cares above all about whether the people I’m writing about will recognize themselves. I’m not thinking about the general reader. My greatest fear is that the people in the world I’m writing about will read it and say, ‘Nah, there’s nothing there.’ ”
Even though he is talking about authenticity, this is saying he wants (as should any writer) his work to connect with the reader and audience. He doesn't want people to skim over what he has written and can't connect with them in the piece. I think if I apply this to myself, then I can write and connect with an audience, so people don’t just skim over or even skip what I have written.
“So much of what comes out of Hollywood is horseshit. Because these people live in West L.A., they don’t even go to East L.A. The only time they go downtown is to get their license renewed. And what they increasingly know about the world is what they see on other TV shows about cops or crime or poverty. The American entertainment industry gets poverty so relentlessly wrong. . . . Poor people are either the salt of the earth, and they’re there to exalt us with their homespun wisdom and their sheer grit and determination to rise up, or they are people to be beaten up in an interrogation room by Sipowicz. . . . How is it that there’s nobody actually on a human scale from the other America? The reason is they’ve never met anybody from the other America. I mean, they could ask their gardener what it’s like.”
Well in terms of reporting, I guess you could get from this is don't be afraid to say what you think/or feel and put it out all on the table. He was to the point, when he said this, where he could say what he felt. However, I wouldn't do that as a rookie journalist, but if someone offers you an opinion piece or column, then go for it. However, maybe keep the language PG-13. I think how it works in terms for me is say what is on my mind and don't be afraid, not really afraid of what to say, but use it as don't be afraid of a challenge and whatnot to speak my mind or just go and do something.
Quote 2-
"To be a decent city reporter, I had to listen to people who were different from me,” Simon explained. “I had to not be uncomfortable asking stupid questions or being on the outside. I found I had a knack for walking into situations where I didn’t know anything, and just waiting. A lot of reporters don’t want to be the butt of jokes. But sometimes it’s useful to act as if you couldn’t find your ass with both hands.”
I think this is a rather important quote because he is basically giving a golden rule. It would be hard, for example, if a racist reporter was out there and refused to interview an African American (if it where important for a certain story), that would be a part of the story that was much needed but wasn't used because the person was stubborn. What I mean by all this is basically what he said, which is pretty clear, ask any question, and just try and learn what you don't know. Getting outside of my comfort zone is key for this profession. By doing this, it will allow me to succeed in really whatever I want, especially in the job world.
Quote 3-
“I’m the kind of person who, when I’m writing, cares above all about whether the people I’m writing about will recognize themselves. I’m not thinking about the general reader. My greatest fear is that the people in the world I’m writing about will read it and say, ‘Nah, there’s nothing there.’ ”
Even though he is talking about authenticity, this is saying he wants (as should any writer) his work to connect with the reader and audience. He doesn't want people to skim over what he has written and can't connect with them in the piece. I think if I apply this to myself, then I can write and connect with an audience, so people don’t just skim over or even skip what I have written.
Friday, October 26, 2007
Lopez Write Up
http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-lopez26oct26,1,3435455.column
Katrina comparisons are a different class of wrong
A quick summary of this story is he is comparing the differences between the Katrina evacuation and the San Diego wildfire evacuations, and how people are thinking these ones are going easier and how San Diego has more people be evacuated (they are wrong obviously, according to the story). He is also being critical of all political parties, saying, "Republicans are better at evacuations than Democrats. This seems to be particularly true when the Republicans in question can flee down the highway in Yukons while Democrats wait for buses trapped under water," & "And I hate to break up the back-slapping party President Bush, Gov. Schwarzenegger and various local officials staged Thursday, but the equipment shortage in the state's wildfires was indisputable."
This story has just about all Murray's narrative ideas = Character (obviously his style of writing and his sarcasm at points), Dramatic Action (what is going on…the wildfires), External and Internal Dialogue (external being the quotes, and internal being his one word sentences and his other thoughts, reactions, and whatnot), Place (San Diego vs. Katrina), Person (him, and all the other people in the story), his (Lopez's) Point of View, his (Lopez's) Narrative Voice, not much Exposition (because he is writing with an incredible amount of bias), Scene (San Diego, New Orleans, etc.), some Chronology (the time of the wildfires and how it is a current affair as well as the Katrina ordeal), and a Theme (the theme is summed up in the top of the article, “So much is different, and so many people want to overlook the differences”).
Lopez does a great job putting all the Narrative Themes in this piece, and the piece is not even very long. One part I really like about his writing, just like some other authors do, is how he breaks up graphs by using one word sentences as other graphs, it kind of makes things flow better and really emphasizes a point. It is really interesting to see how he uses long quotes, and a good amount of them, and doesn't just make it a news story, but is also making it a reading, narrative-type of a story.
Katrina comparisons are a different class of wrong
A quick summary of this story is he is comparing the differences between the Katrina evacuation and the San Diego wildfire evacuations, and how people are thinking these ones are going easier and how San Diego has more people be evacuated (they are wrong obviously, according to the story). He is also being critical of all political parties, saying, "Republicans are better at evacuations than Democrats. This seems to be particularly true when the Republicans in question can flee down the highway in Yukons while Democrats wait for buses trapped under water," & "And I hate to break up the back-slapping party President Bush, Gov. Schwarzenegger and various local officials staged Thursday, but the equipment shortage in the state's wildfires was indisputable."
This story has just about all Murray's narrative ideas = Character (obviously his style of writing and his sarcasm at points), Dramatic Action (what is going on…the wildfires), External and Internal Dialogue (external being the quotes, and internal being his one word sentences and his other thoughts, reactions, and whatnot), Place (San Diego vs. Katrina), Person (him, and all the other people in the story), his (Lopez's) Point of View, his (Lopez's) Narrative Voice, not much Exposition (because he is writing with an incredible amount of bias), Scene (San Diego, New Orleans, etc.), some Chronology (the time of the wildfires and how it is a current affair as well as the Katrina ordeal), and a Theme (the theme is summed up in the top of the article, “So much is different, and so many people want to overlook the differences”).
Lopez does a great job putting all the Narrative Themes in this piece, and the piece is not even very long. One part I really like about his writing, just like some other authors do, is how he breaks up graphs by using one word sentences as other graphs, it kind of makes things flow better and really emphasizes a point. It is really interesting to see how he uses long quotes, and a good amount of them, and doesn't just make it a news story, but is also making it a reading, narrative-type of a story.
Thursday, October 25, 2007
4 Questions
1) What letter is filed off the old manual type writer in the Boston herald newsroom when Don Murray went to work there
2) How well would that work in a newspaper in Illinois
3) How well would it work in your own writing, esp. feature writing
4) Paragraph about the way you approach feature writing, the way good writers approach feature writing
Post to blog
1) Capitol “I”
2) Probably not as well as one would think, because there are a lot of opinonated pieces in Illinois, esp. Springfield
3)I think fairly well, except here, but I am not the type of person that uses "I" in a lot of my pieces, esp. in the Bulldog or for class assignments.
4) Feature writing, to me, is approached just like any other writing. However, it gets put off a little more, because there is a deadline. This gives me time to really think about what to write and gather my thoughts. Plus, when working under pressure, my work becomes better and it allows me to think better and quicker. For some reason, my thinking is always better under the gun. I tried not to use I in this, except for there.
2) How well would that work in a newspaper in Illinois
3) How well would it work in your own writing, esp. feature writing
4) Paragraph about the way you approach feature writing, the way good writers approach feature writing
Post to blog
1) Capitol “I”
2) Probably not as well as one would think, because there are a lot of opinonated pieces in Illinois, esp. Springfield
3)I think fairly well, except here, but I am not the type of person that uses "I" in a lot of my pieces, esp. in the Bulldog or for class assignments.
4) Feature writing, to me, is approached just like any other writing. However, it gets put off a little more, because there is a deadline. This gives me time to really think about what to write and gather my thoughts. Plus, when working under pressure, my work becomes better and it allows me to think better and quicker. For some reason, my thinking is always better under the gun. I tried not to use I in this, except for there.
Wednesday, October 17, 2007
The Eat This Reply...
1) I think he kind of acts like a comedian who likes to insult his audience (readers), and yet I found myself wanting to read more, because I don't eat fast food at all...I found it interesting as well as very humerous (I must admit I do like fast food commercials, because they try to one up each other in stupidity).
2) I like his insulting, big-brother-style of picking on you (meaning the fast food consumers), he uses big words at the start to draw you in, because your thinking what the hell is he trying to talk about...but then he just goes with it. I like that I loved was "Oh my, yes. It's like a giant middle finger to your heart." IF I where a fast food consumer, I would think twice before eatting there again after reading this...
to eat this food in order to eat."
3) People in his town would like it, because that seems to be the attitude it reflects on the city...just like the writer from Chicago (the thug, tough guy attitude there), people flock to that because they can relate to that...However, an average fast food online consumer probably is thinking "where does this guy get off talking like this...my day is so busy, I have
4) His column would not fly here...maybe in a big city like Chicago or St. Louis, but not Springfield...to many people would be insulted. I think they should look at it through a humerous, satire style story.
2) I like his insulting, big-brother-style of picking on you (meaning the fast food consumers), he uses big words at the start to draw you in, because your thinking what the hell is he trying to talk about...but then he just goes with it. I like that I loved was "Oh my, yes. It's like a giant middle finger to your heart." IF I where a fast food consumer, I would think twice before eatting there again after reading this...
to eat this food in order to eat."
3) People in his town would like it, because that seems to be the attitude it reflects on the city...just like the writer from Chicago (the thug, tough guy attitude there), people flock to that because they can relate to that...However, an average fast food online consumer probably is thinking "where does this guy get off talking like this...my day is so busy, I have
4) His column would not fly here...maybe in a big city like Chicago or St. Louis, but not Springfield...to many people would be insulted. I think they should look at it through a humerous, satire style story.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)